First Posted at Cracking Health Costs on 5/28/2013
Sharon Begley, Reuters’ chief science writer, has written a terrific piece on this breaking news. Based on a study mandated by Congress, the non-partisan Rand Corporation studied wellness programs of 600 businesses and found only modest returns from workplace wellness, extremely modest. Please read the full article.
Writes Begley, “Those findings run contrary to claims by the mostly small firms that sell workplace wellness to companies ranging from corporate titans to mom-and-pop operations.”
Let’s look at examples the kinds of returns you can expect from your wellness program:
- Weight loss? One pound a year for three years.
- Cholesterol improvement? Nothing significant.
- Smoking cessation? Nothing significant.
- Dollar savings for participants per year compared to non-participants? A modest $3.46 per month after five years, and much less in earlier years. (But at what cost?) Sadly, even that small saving level is statistically insignificant.
- Reductions in emergency room use or hospital stays? None found.
Yet, “Employers told RAND they were ‘overwhelmingly’ confident that workplace wellness reduces medical costs.” To understand this stark disconnect between reality and benefit manager perceptions, again I urge you to read the full article.
Some will defend these programs as useful recruiting/retention/engagement tools. Tom Emerick’s personal opinion is that the employees you recruit and retain by your wellness program may be the wrong employees. BTW, this is not really big news to readers of Cracking Health Costs, but it is good to see the Rand Corporation, among others, exposing wellness failures.Follow docweighsin