« VPH: The beautiful face of globalization | Main | In praise of the old fashioned: Diuretics are still the best »

Plumpy'nut

Brian Klepper

The NY Times has an important op-ed today by Susan Shepherd, a pediatrician and medical advisor to Doctors Without Borders. The core of her message is that as the farm bill progresses through Congress, we should focus not only on the quantity of food that is produced and that we export for relief to underdeveloped nations, but on its quality as well.

Dr. Shepherd describes the difficulties in treating children who are victims of severe malnutrition, particularly in areas like Africa and South Asia where milk and clean water can be scarce.

The US and other international donors current supply fortified blended flours for moderately malnourished children. Much better and more accessible nutrition is available through a ready-to-use food called Plumpy'nut (or Plumpy). But Plumpy costs a little more, and current UN and US guidelines restrict its use to the 3% of children who have already decended to the most acute malnutrition.

Ten years ago, a French pediatric nutritionist affiliated with the World Health Organization, Andre Briend, developed Plumpy'nut, a high protein and high energy food bar comprised of peanut paste, vegetable oil, milk powder, powdered sugar, vitamins and minerals, that can be prepared locally and that has a two year shelf life in an unopened package. Children can be treated at home rather than in hospital settings, a critical advance. They receive 2 packets a day. Delivered in combination with Unimix, a vitamin-enriched flour for making porridge, a 2-4 week treatment costs $20 and can allow 90 percent of severely malnourished children to recover.

One of the lessons of Jeffrey Sachs' book, The End of Poverty, is that we now have the tools to stabilize the billion people who remain in extreme poverty, so that we can then help them onto the bottom rungs of the economic ladder, where they have a chance to prosper.

Despite its current economic gloom, America remains a center of prosperity in a volatile world. Think of the goodwill we could create if we resolved to couple our aid with the best we we've learned in food science and other disciplines. The creation of Plumpy is a shining example of what's possible, and the work of Doctors Without Borders and other relief organizations an inspiration for how we can cultivate peace in the world.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (16)

What is so frightening about letting others achieve their maximum potential in the world?
January 30, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterDenise
Yes to helping those starving. The problem is out of control population in those countries. They need to control the enormous explosion and need to look for help in that area.
June 22, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterH. Pierce
i have been trying to find a source for plumpynut,so that it could be purchased for shipment to missions in kenya and possibly mexico.would like to get quotes for this purpose in various quantities up to 20 ft. container.
July 2, 2008 | Unregistered Commenterjohn stockhausen
What if the child is allergic to nuts? Food is difficult enough to come by in these regions, so I doubt allergy tests are run.
July 18, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterYR
Perhaps a side issue, and a contentious one at that, but what about coupling this nutritional aid with family planning help and sexual health assistance? Things like birth control, sexual health awareness through education and family planning clinics and advice? Not to knock this effort in any way, but it just seems like an attempt to treat the effects of a problem, rather than seeing the truly basic human need within countries with high child-illness and malnutrition rates. If you're going to get the church involved in such aid, to what extent can women and 'families' be helped before childbirth? And why does it seem there is little aid offered (comparatively) in the way of contraception and sexual health assistance?
July 19, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterSNA
This will undoubtedly sound strange to western ears, but perhaps these women think of children as a blessing. I didn't see any of them asking for fewer children, I saw them asking the doctors to help keep their children alive for the first few years of their lives. The children are not the "underlying problem."
July 21, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterMary
The C.E.O.'s of huge corporate chemical plants don't "see the problem" of what they are doing, either.
Just because the people who are doing the overpopulating are unable to see the problem does not mean that the problem does not exist.
The distribution of emergency food for undernourished children is nothing but a temporary patch on a constantly growing problem - I agree completely with the others who have posted: overpopulation is the root of the problem here. Family planning needs to be provided.
July 27, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterZ.
Wait... Let Rev. Malthus and his theories of overpopulation rest and leave them alone. They were debunked decades ago. The food being produced in the US alone is shipped overseas and can feed the world twice over annually. Population is declining in Europe and I don't hear the applause. Only the clamor for more incentives for couples to have more kids. What!
Let us not look at biased media pictures of dark children suffering from malnutrition at a refugee camp or hospital and conjecture that the solution to their problem is death. How Kervorkian, and racist. I don't hear anyone saying the solution to poverty and malnutrition in Appalachian children - majority white - is due to overpopulation and they must reduce their numbers. Enough of the complaint that there are too many of the other and too few of us. Get over the fact that most of the world's population is dark, and yes, they are bearing as many children as they want to love and cherish.
Birth control is not a panacea to all ills. It doesn't even always work. People are not a threat to the earth.
Bad economic policies, corruption, and indifference are some of the evils contributing to malnutrition globally. People are the world's primary resource and we live for each other. Unless you like and want a world of one - more power to you.
My only gripe with Plumpy"Nut - I wish it's innovation started in Africa or Asia. However, I applaud Briend and his love for children everywhere.
August 1, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterMusowa Akoma
John Stockhausen was trying to find a source for Plumpynut. The French manufacturer is Nutriset - see www.nutriset.fr. Information about local distributors can be found at http://www.plumpynutinthefield.com.
September 6, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterRosemary Cairns
There is another source for this RUTF (ready-to-use therapeutic food). The one mentioned in this article is the product called Plumpy-nut by the manufacturer, Nutriset, but it would be wise to check into Project Peanut Butter,a non-profit run by Dr. Manary who is at Washington University and is a doctor at St. Louis Children's Hospital. Project Peanut Butter produces and distributes the RUTF using a formula tested by Dr. Manary (same concept and nutritional value as Pumpy-nut). See their website for more information. Their community-based protocol has been cited by Doctors without Borders and UNICEF and World Health Organization as the most effective method by which to treat severely malnourished children. I believe they offer their RUTF at cost to relief agencies.
October 29, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterSharon
Plumy'nut is an excellent product. However this does not consider peanut allergies that are so prevalent and widespread. I had submitted a proposal to SBIR for a similar product to alleviate starvation/malnutrition, but could not get funding. Why have a product with just peanut taste when you can have your choice of any flavor you want? And yes, all the nutrition you need. If you have funding, I would like to hear from you: callsanyal@yahoo.com
November 7, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterSanyal
the last thing anyone is thinking about is peanut allergies, and fyi, im 100% sure they didnt put the peanut in it as a flavor, peanuts are very very high in protien calories and fats and is also why most protien bars contain peanuts. as for family planning and birth control, im certain they already do this but theres millions of people that wont get the message,the government is not as stable as ours and dont care about those issues
January 18, 2009 | Unregistered Commenterjw
Family planning should be considered; but what if the people using Plumpy Nut aren't aware of "family planning"? For instance, what if they don't comprehend the theory or their religion conflicts with it? Also, most people in the country using Plumpy Nut can't afford birth control and to them that is like abortion (which is wrong on many levels). I believe that this product is a wonderful and inexpensive solution to malnutrition. Just ask yourself this, "What would you do if it were your kids who were malnurished and all you could afford was Plumpy Nut?". I bet you would do whatever it took to save your childs life.
February 4, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterSW
From what I have read, the food allergies that are so prevalent in industrialized countries are almost non existent in underdeveloped, impoverished nations, so the comment about the peanut allergies does not really apply here.
February 6, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterSStahl
Read Anderson Cooper's report. They brought up food allergies. Apparently, it's only a problem to people with the luxury to pick and choose their food.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/10/19/60minutes/main3386661_page3.shtml
February 18, 2009 | Unregistered Commenternutter
The concerns about overpopulation will have to come later. At this point, people in impoverished countries tend to have "more" children because many do not survive into adulthood. Anderson Cooper's report lists it well.

"In the countryside, where 85 percent of people live, girls start marrying as young as 11 years old. By the age of 15 most are wed, and by 16 most have already become mothers. The average woman here will give birth at least eight times in her lifetime. But largely because of malnutrition, one in five of their children will die before they reach the age of five. Of those who survive, half will have stunted growth and never reach full adult height."
April 27, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterB.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.